All site signals below are preliminary site signals — not a determination. Verify before you rely on them.
Data confidence
A plain-language status — not a score. This page documents 3 facts from public records, estimates 2 more from models, relies on 8 unverified screening defaults, and lists 8 things to verify before you rely on it.
- What we know
- 3 documented signals (parcel boundary, jurisdiction, market status) — each carries its source and as-of date below.
- What we estimate
- 2 modeled values (preliminary setback envelope (uniform conservative buffer — edges not classified), sewer proximity (estimated)) — modeled, not measured; treat as screening only.
- What needs verification
- 8 items only a professional or the city can confirm — the full checklist is below.
- Rules basis
- Regional/state screening defaults (unverified) — Some rules shown use a regional screening default — the Linwood Township ordinance is not yet loaded for them; verify locally before relying on any number.
Plain-English summary
This parcel in Linwood Township sits in the Forest Lake Public School District school district. Part of the parcel is mapped in a FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area, so flood insurance and elevation requirements likely apply. Wetland indicators overlap the parcel in screening data — a field delineation is the next step, since mapped lines are not legal boundaries. On utilities, water service is undocumented and sewer service is inside the regional service area — a connection is not confirmed until the city or utility confirms it, so budget time to verify location and fees. We do not yet have data on terrain, water service, and tree canopy — on this page, unknown never means "no concern."
Rules applied: Regional/state screening defaults (unverified) Some rules shown use a regional screening default — the Linwood Township ordinance is not yet loaded for them; verify locally before relying on any number.
What we know, what we estimate, what you must verify
What we know
Recorded, authoritative facts.
- Parcel boundaryRecorded county GIS parcel on file (not a survey)
Source: County GIS
- JurisdictionLinwood Township, Anoka County
Source: County GIS
- Market statusPotential build site — identified from county GIS
What we estimate
Modeled or preliminary — useful for screening, not decisions.
What you must verify
Professional and municipal confirmations before you build.
- Boundary survey (a recorded GIS boundary is not a survey)
- Wetland delineation by a certified delineator
- Soil borings & septic feasibility (if no municipal sewer)
- Utility connection points, capacity and SAC/WAC fees with the city or utility
- Permit eligibility and any overlay/PUD conditions with the jurisdiction
- Easements, covenants and title work
- Final setbacks and buildable area per the current local ordinance
- Actual construction cost from builder quotes
What each signal means
Written for homeowners; open “the details” on any card for the builder view and the raw measurement behind it.
Slope & terrain: not yet evaluated — unknown is not the same as no concern. no slope statistics
The details
Builder view: Slope & terrain: no qualifying evidence in the current dataset (no slope statistics); treat as unresolved, not as clear.
No underlying measurement on file for this signal.
- Unknown ≠ clear: absence of data is never treated as "no concern".
0% confidence
Part of this parcel is mapped in a FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area (zone AE); flood insurance and elevation requirements likely apply — confirm with the city and a surveyor.
The details
Builder view: FEMA zone AE (SFHA) per current NFHL data; floodplain ordinance and base flood elevation requirements apply — elevation certificate and local floodplain review required.
- Zone boundary is map-scale; a surveyed elevation governs.
90% confidence · source: FEMA NFHL flood hazard zones (MN DNR GDRS mirror) · as of 8/19/2026
Wetland indicators
! ConcernMapped wetland/public-water indicators overlap this parcel. This is a screening result, not a confirmed legal boundary — a wetland delineation is recommended before design or purchase decisions.
Uses a regional screening default — the local ordinance is not yet loaded. Verify locally.
The details
Builder view: NWI/PWI overlap present — a SCREENING constraint, not a delineated boundary; a wetland delineation is recommended before design or purchase decisions. A 50 ft screening buffer applies (screening default). WCA/LGU review applies if impacts are proposed.
- Screening-level mapping only; field conditions govern.
- regional/state screening default (unverified) — not the local ordinance; verify with the jurisdiction
50% confidence · rule tier: regional screening default (unverified) · source: Updated MN National Wetlands Inventory; DNR Public Waters Inventory basins · as of 8/19/2026
Sanitary sewer
i Info ModeledPublic utilities may be available nearby; connection location & fees require confirmation
Uses a regional screening default — the local ordinance is not yet loaded. Verify locally.
The details
Builder view: sanitary sewer: inside the regional wastewater service area (MUSA) — membership is a planning designation, NOT a connection at the boundary; timing unknown, confirm staging with the city.
- Sewer service state: Inside planned regional wastewater service area — not a sewer connection
- Service-area membership is modeled from regional GIS, not utility records.
- Without a municipal sewer connection, an on-site septic system (SSTS) is required, including a primary and alternate drainfield site (regional/state screening default (unverified) — not the local ordinance; verify with the jurisdiction).
55% confidence · rule tier: regional screening default (unverified)
Water service: not yet evaluated — unknown is not the same as no concern. water service not documented
The details
Builder view: Water service: no qualifying evidence in the current dataset (water service not documented); treat as unresolved, not as clear.
No underlying measurement on file for this signal.
- Unknown ≠ clear: absence of data is never treated as "no concern".
0% confidence
This parcel is in the Forest Lake Public School District school district per current boundary data.
The details
Builder view: School district: Forest Lake Public School District (MDE boundary data; boundaries can change — verify for enrollment decisions).
90% confidence · source: MDE school district boundaries · as of 8/19/2026
Setback & frontage envelope
i InfoOn a lot this size, zoning is not the practical limit on house size: required setbacks would allow a regulatory maximum of ≈ 112,579 sq ft — far more room than any house uses. Site conditions, access, utilities and budget govern what is practical here. Based on regional/state screening default (unverified) — not the local ordinance; verify with the jurisdiction setbacks; confirm your parcel's zoning. Governing setback is the shoreland OHWL standard (150 ft) — regional/state screening default (unverified) — not the local ordinance; verify with the jurisdiction; no mapped public water reduced the buildable area here, so the OHWL term does not bind.
Uses a regional screening default — the local ordinance is not yet loaded. Verify locally.
The details
Builder view: Regulatory maximum footprint ≈ 112,579 sq ft (setback-derived; setbacks alone allow ≈ 112,579 sq ft). Regulation is not the binding constraint at this parcel size. Based on regional/state screening default (unverified) — not the local ordinance; verify with the jurisdiction setbacks; confirm your parcel's zoning. Governing setback is the shoreland OHWL standard (150 ft) — regional/state screening default (unverified) — not the local ordinance; verify with the jurisdiction; no mapped public water reduced the buildable area here, so the OHWL term does not bind.
No underlying measurement on file for this signal.
- Regulatory maximum — not a suggested or typical house size.
- Confidence is limited by: the rules basis is an unverified regional screening default, not the local ordinance.
- Setback-derived figure is a conservative uniform-buffer approximation — irrelevant to house size at this parcel scale either way.
- Rules basis is a generic screening default — it has no source currency date.
- regional/state screening default (unverified) — not the local ordinance; verify with the jurisdiction
45% confidence · rule tier: regional screening default (unverified) · source: Generic MN residential screening defaults — UNVERIFIED DEFAULT VALUES, not an adopted ordinance (conservative statewide screening basis; MN Rules 6120 shoreland / 7080 SSTS used as reference points only)
This lot is in a mapped shoreland zone of a Recreational Development-class water: structures must be set back 150 ft from the ordinary high water line (regional screening default). The OHWL location comes from a survey, not a map.
Uses a regional screening default — the local ordinance is not yet loaded. Verify locally.
The details
Builder view: Shoreland zone — DNR class Recreational Development. structures must be set back 150 ft from the ordinary high water line — regional/state screening default (unverified) — not the local ordinance; verify with the jurisdiction. Bluff and shoreland-impervious standards may also apply; OHWL per survey.
- Part of this parcel is within 1000 ft of the OHWL of Typo (DNR PWI). Zone membership derived spatially at the MN statutory shoreland distances; the mapped OHWL is not a survey.
- regional/state screening default (unverified) — not the local ordinance; verify with the jurisdiction
50% confidence · rule tier: regional screening default (unverified) · source: DNR Public Waters Inventory basins · as of 8/19/2026
Trees & canopy: not yet evaluated — unknown is not the same as no concern. tree-canopy coverage not yet computed
The details
Builder view: Trees & canopy: no qualifying evidence in the current dataset (tree-canopy coverage not yet computed); treat as unresolved, not as clear.
No underlying measurement on file for this signal.
- Unknown ≠ clear: absence of data is never treated as "no concern".
0% confidence
Build on this lot
A builder can turn the verify list above into answers — ask about this lot with no obligation.
Site signals
The raw per-field record behind the interpretation above — the same rights-filtered fields, each with its own source and last-verified date.
School districti Info Verified
Forest Lake Public School District
Source & last verified
Source: MDE school district boundaries. Last verified: 8/19/2026.
Flood zone! Concern Verified
Zone AE (FEMA special flood hazard area) Preliminary site signal — not a determination.
Source & last verified
Source: FEMA NFHL flood hazard zones (MN DNR GDRS mirror). Last verified: 8/19/2026.
Wetland presence! Concern Verified
Yes NWI is a planning tool; preliminary, not a delineation.
Source & last verified
Source: Updated MN National Wetlands Inventory. Last verified: 8/19/2026.
DNR public waters! Concern Verified
Yes
Source & last verified
Source: DNR Public Waters Inventory basins. Last verified: 8/19/2026.
DNR shoreland classificationi Info Verified
Shoreland — Recreational Development class water Part of this parcel is within 1000 ft of the OHWL of Typo (DNR PWI). Zone membership derived spatially at the MN statutory shoreland distances; the mapped OHWL is not a survey.
Source & last verified
Source: DNR Public Waters Inventory basins. Last verified: 8/19/2026.
Utilities
Seweri Info Modeled
Inside planned regional wastewater service area — not a sewer connection
Nearby sites in Linwood Township
Other potential building sites near this one — straight-line distance between parcel centres. Same preliminary signals, same caveats.