← All Cottage Grove sites ← Back to all lots
Potential build site — identified from county GIS
A plain-language status — not a score. This page documents 3 facts from public records, estimates 2 more from models, relies on 7 unverified screening defaults, and lists 8 things to verify before you rely on it.
This parcel in Cottage Grove sits in the South Washington County Schools school district. Current FEMA mapping shows no Special Flood Hazard Area on the parcel, though local or unmapped drainage can still require review. No wetlands are mapped on the parcel in screening data, though small basins can go unmapped and a delineation is still recommended before construction. On utilities, water service is undocumented and sewer service is inside the regional service area — a connection is not confirmed until the city or utility confirms it, so budget time to verify location and fees. We do not yet have data on terrain, water service, and tree canopy — on this page, unknown never means "no concern."
Rules applied: Regional/state screening defaults (unverified) Some rules shown use a regional screening default — the Cottage Grove ordinance is not yet loaded for them; verify locally before relying on any number.
Recorded, authoritative facts.
Modeled or preliminary — useful for screening, not decisions.
Professional and municipal confirmations before you build.
Written for homeowners; open “the details” on any card for the builder view and the raw measurement behind it.
Slope & terrain: not yet evaluated — unknown is not the same as no concern. no slope statistics
Builder view: Slope & terrain: no qualifying evidence in the current dataset (no slope statistics); treat as unresolved, not as clear.
No FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area identified on the parcel in the current dataset; local/unmapped drainage may still require review
Builder view: FEMA zone X (outside mapped SFHA) per current NFHL data; local/unmapped drainage and stormwater requirements still apply at design.
No mapped wetland/public-water indicators on this parcel in the current screening datasets; small or unmapped wetlands can still exist — a wetland delineation is recommended before design or purchase decisions.
Uses a regional screening default — the local ordinance is not yet loaded. Verify locally.
Builder view: No NWI/PWI overlap in current screening data; datasets under-map small basins — a wetland delineation is recommended before design or purchase decisions where soils/vegetation suggest hydrology. A 50 ft screening buffer applies (screening default).
Public utilities may be available nearby; connection location & fees require confirmation
Uses a regional screening default — the local ordinance is not yet loaded. Verify locally.
Builder view: sanitary sewer: inside the regional wastewater service area (MUSA) — membership is a planning designation, NOT a connection at the boundary; timing unknown, confirm staging with the city.
Water service: not yet evaluated — unknown is not the same as no concern. water service not documented
Builder view: Water service: no qualifying evidence in the current dataset (water service not documented); treat as unresolved, not as clear.
This parcel is in the South Washington County Schools school district per current boundary data.
Builder view: School district: South Washington County Schools (MDE boundary data; boundaries can change — verify for enrollment decisions).
After each edge's own required setback (screening defaults) — front to the street edge, rear opposite, sides to the side lines — roughly 3,138 sq ft remains buildable — preliminary, not an approval or survey. Based on regional/state screening default (unverified) — not the local ordinance; verify with the jurisdiction setbacks; confirm your parcel's zoning.
Uses a regional screening default — the local ordinance is not yet loaded. Verify locally.
Builder view: Setbacks applied per edge (front/rear/side identified from parcel geometry and street frontage): envelope ≈ 3,138 sq ft (front 35 ft, side 15 ft, rear 35 ft, corner side 20 ft; 100% of the boundary classified); preliminary planar computation — not an approval or survey. Based on regional/state screening default (unverified) — not the local ordinance; verify with the jurisdiction setbacks; confirm your parcel's zoning.
This lot is outside mapped shoreland zones — no public water within 1,000 ft (lake) or 300 ft (watercourse) in the current DNR screening.
Builder view: Not in a DNR PWI shoreland zone per statutory-distance screening; shoreland overlay standards do not apply. Screening-level: the mapped OHWL is not a survey.
Trees & canopy: not yet evaluated — unknown is not the same as no concern. tree-canopy coverage not yet computed
Builder view: Trees & canopy: no qualifying evidence in the current dataset (tree-canopy coverage not yet computed); treat as unresolved, not as clear.
A builder can turn the verify list above into answers — ask about this lot with no obligation.
Get a build evaluation from vetted Twin Cities builders. This is a request to find a builder — not a real-estate listing or offer of representation.
The raw per-field record behind the interpretation above — the same rights-filtered fields, each with its own source and last-verified date.
South Washington County Schools
Source: MDE school district boundaries. Last verified: 8/13/2026.
Zone X (outside the mapped 500-year floodplain) Preliminary site signal — not a determination.
Source: FEMA NFHL flood hazard zones (MN DNR GDRS mirror). Last verified: 8/13/2026.
No NWI is a planning tool; preliminary, not a delineation.
Source: Updated MN National Wetlands Inventory. Last verified: 8/13/2026.
No
Source: DNR Public Waters Inventory basins. Last verified: 8/13/2026.
Not in a shoreland district No mapped public water within 1000 ft (lake) / 300 ft (watercourse) of this parcel in the current DNR PWI screening.
Source: DNR Public Waters Inventory basins. Last verified: 8/13/2026.
Inside planned regional wastewater service area — not a sewer connection
Other potential building sites near this one — straight-line distance between parcel centres. Same preliminary signals, same caveats.
