← All Roseville sites ← Back to all lots
Potential build site — identified from county GIS
County assessed value: land $45,600 · total $52,400 (taxes payable 2026)
Assessed value: Ramsey County record in the MetroGIS Regional Parcel Dataset, released Jul 20, 2026. County values are set for property tax, trail the market and phase in on newly platted lots (Minn. Stat. § 273.11, subd. 14a). Not an asking price.
Privately owned
Computed from county parcel and map data, as of October 2026. Screening only, not a survey. Sources: Met Council road centerlines (2026-10-08), Generalized Land Use 2025 and active railroads; the regional parcel dataset (2026-07-20); NWI wetlands and DNR public waters; the UMN 2015 1-m tree canopy. Elevation: the MN DNR LiDAR 1 m bare-earth elevation model (metro collection, validated October 2012), data contributed by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Walkout and lookout potential are a builder rule of thumb, not a survey.
A plain-language status — not a score. This page documents 3 facts from public records, estimates 2 more from models, relies on 8 unverified screening defaults, and lists 8 things to verify before you rely on it.
This parcel in Roseville sits in the Roseville Public Schools (ISD 623) school district. Part of the parcel is mapped in a FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area, so flood insurance and elevation requirements likely apply. Wetland indicators overlap the parcel in screening data — a field delineation is the next step, since mapped lines are not legal boundaries. On utilities, water service is undocumented and sewer service is inside the regional service area — a connection is not confirmed until the city or utility confirms it, so budget time to verify location and fees. Tree cover is substantial — most of the lot sits under canopy in the 2015 modeled estimate, so plan for clearing and tree-preservation choices. We do not yet have data on terrain and water service — on this page, unknown never means "no concern."
Rules applied: Regional/state screening defaults (unverified) Some rules shown use a regional screening default — the Roseville ordinance is not yet loaded for them; verify locally before relying on any number.
Recorded, authoritative facts.
Modeled or preliminary — useful for screening, not decisions.
Professional and municipal confirmations before you build.
Written for homeowners; open “the details” on any card for the builder view and the raw measurement behind it.
Slope & terrain: not yet evaluated — unknown is not the same as no concern. no slope statistics
Builder view: Slope & terrain: no qualifying evidence in the current dataset (no slope statistics); treat as unresolved, not as clear.
Part of this parcel is mapped in a FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area (zone AE); flood insurance and elevation requirements likely apply — confirm with the city and a surveyor.
Builder view: FEMA zone AE (SFHA) per current NFHL data; floodplain ordinance and base flood elevation requirements apply — elevation certificate and local floodplain review required.
Mapped wetland/public-water indicators overlap this parcel. This is a screening result, not a confirmed legal boundary — a wetland delineation is recommended before design or purchase decisions.
Uses a regional screening default — the local ordinance is not yet loaded. Verify locally.
Builder view: NWI/PWI overlap present — a SCREENING constraint, not a delineated boundary; a wetland delineation is recommended before design or purchase decisions. A 50 ft screening buffer applies (screening default). WCA/LGU review applies if impacts are proposed.
Public utilities may be available nearby; connection location & fees require confirmation
Uses a regional screening default — the local ordinance is not yet loaded. Verify locally.
Builder view: sanitary sewer: inside the regional wastewater service area (MUSA) — membership is a planning designation, NOT a connection at the boundary; timing unknown, confirm staging with the city.
Water service: not yet evaluated — unknown is not the same as no concern. water service not documented
Builder view: Water service: no qualifying evidence in the current dataset (water service not documented); treat as unresolved, not as clear.
This parcel is in the Roseville Public Schools (ISD 623) school district per current boundary data.
Builder view: School district: Roseville Public Schools (ISD 623) — MDE boundary data; boundaries can change, so verify for enrollment decisions.
Preliminary buildable envelope ≈ 1,749 sq ft (about 5.4% of the lot) — a conservative estimate; the actual buildable area is likely larger once lot edges are classified. Based on regional/state screening default (unverified) — not the local ordinance; verify with the jurisdiction setbacks; confirm your parcel's zoning. Governing setback is the shoreland OHWL standard (150 ft) — regional/state screening default (unverified) — not the local ordinance; verify with the jurisdiction; measured from the mapped water edge (DNR Public Waters Inventory basin delineation, retrieved 2026-08-08) — an approximation, not the surveyed ordinary high water line.
Uses a regional screening default — the local ordinance is not yet loaded. Verify locally.
Builder view: Conservative uniform inward buffer at the largest applicable setback (35 ft): ≈ 1,749 sq ft (5.4% of lot). Under-approximates the true asymmetric envelope; edge classification will refine. Resolved setbacks: front 35 ft, side 15 ft, rear 35 ft, corner side 20 ft. Based on regional/state screening default (unverified) — not the local ordinance; verify with the jurisdiction setbacks; confirm your parcel's zoning. Governing setback is the shoreland OHWL standard (150 ft) — regional/state screening default (unverified) — not the local ordinance; verify with the jurisdiction; measured from the mapped water edge (DNR Public Waters Inventory basin delineation, retrieved 2026-08-08) — an approximation, not the surveyed ordinary high water line.
This lot is in a mapped shoreland zone of a General Development-class water: structures must be set back 150 ft from the ordinary high water line (regional screening default). The OHWL location comes from a survey, not a map.
Uses a regional screening default — the local ordinance is not yet loaded. Verify locally.
Builder view: Shoreland zone — DNR class General Development. structures must be set back 150 ft from the ordinary high water line — regional/state screening default (unverified) — not the local ordinance; verify with the jurisdiction. Bluff and shoreland-impervious standards may also apply; OHWL per survey.
This lot reads as wooded — about 62.5% of it sits under tree canopy (2015 modeled estimate). Expect real trees, and real tree-clearing decisions.
Builder view: Tree canopy ≈ 62.5% of parcel area (Wooded; bands: wooded ≥ 50%, partially wooded 20–50%). Source: 2015 UMN 1-m urban tree canopy (deciduous + coniferous classes); verify current conditions on site — clearing, storms and growth since 2015 are not reflected.
A builder can turn the verify list above into answers — ask about this lot with no obligation.
Get a build evaluation from vetted Twin Cities builders. This is a request to find a builder — not a real-estate listing or offer of representation.
The raw per-field record behind the interpretation above — the same rights-filtered fields, each with its own source and last-verified date.
Roseville Public Schools (ISD 623)
Source: MDE School District Boundaries, SY2025-26. Last verified: 10/12/2026.
Zone AE (FEMA special flood hazard area) Preliminary site signal — not a determination.
Source: FEMA NFHL flood hazard zones (MN DNR GDRS mirror). Last verified: 10/12/2026.
No NWI is a planning tool; preliminary, not a delineation.
Source: Updated MN National Wetlands Inventory. Last verified: 10/12/2026.
Yes
Source: DNR Public Waters Inventory basins. Last verified: 10/12/2026.
Shoreland — General Development class water Part of this parcel is within 1000 ft of the OHWL of Owasso (DNR PWI). Zone membership derived spatially at the MN statutory shoreland distances; the mapped OHWL is not a survey.
Source: DNR Public Waters Inventory basins. Last verified: 10/12/2026.
62.5% Modeled from the 2015 UMN 1-m urban tree canopy raster (deciduous + coniferous classes); canopy may have changed since 2015. Screening only, not a survey.
Source: UMN 2015 TCMA Urban Tree Canopy (1 m, RSGAL/DRUM). Last verified: 10/13/2026.
Inside planned regional wastewater service area — not a sewer connection
Other potential building sites near this one — straight-line distance between parcel centres. Same preliminary signals, same caveats.
