All site signals below are preliminary site signals — not a determination. Verify before you rely on them.
Data confidence
A plain-language status — not a score. This page documents 4 facts from public records (one of them the 3 building rules cited to Rogers City Code §125-55 Tables 6–10 (most restrictive of the five residential districts)), estimates 2 more from models, relies on 4 unverified screening defaults, and lists 8 things to verify before you rely on it.
What we know
4 documented signals (building rules (cited), parcel boundary, jurisdiction, market status) — each carries its source and as-of date below.
What we estimate
2 modeled values (preliminary setback envelope (per-edge range — front street unresolved between two plausible frontages), sewer proximity (estimated)) — modeled, not measured; treat as screening only.
What needs verification
8 items only a professional or the city can confirm — the full checklist is below.
Rules basis
Rogers Residential Districts — Rogers City Code §125-55 Tables 6–10 (Municode/CivicPlus, api.municode.com client 15597 product 17241 job 499656; code currency Ord. No. 2026-13 enacted 2026-07-14, Supp. No. 3 Update 3; section history Ord. No. 2026-04, § 2, 4-14-2026; retrieved 2026-08-17) + regional screening defaults for rules not yet loaded — City values shown are for the typical single-family district — per-parcel zoning is not ingested, so confirm your parcel’s specific zoning district with the city. Some rules shown use a regional screening default — the Rogers ordinance is not yet loaded for them; verify locally before relying on any number. Rogers assigns setbacks by residential district, and this product does not yet know which district each parcel is in. The figures shown are the most restrictive of the city's five residential districts, so the buildable area may be larger than shown; confirm your parcel's district with the City.
Plain-English summary
This parcel in Rogers sits in the Elk River Public School District school district. Part of the parcel is mapped in a FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area, so flood insurance and elevation requirements likely apply. Wetland indicators overlap the parcel in screening data — a field delineation is the next step, since mapped lines are not legal boundaries. On utilities, water service is undocumented and sewer service is inside the regional service area — a connection is not confirmed until the city or utility confirms it, so budget time to verify location and fees. We do not yet have data on terrain, water service, and tree canopy — on this page, unknown never means "no concern."
Rules applied: Rogers Residential Districts — Rogers City Code §125-55 Tables 6–10 (Municode/CivicPlus, api.municode.com client 15597 product 17241 job 499656; code currency Ord. No. 2026-13 enacted 2026-07-14, Supp. No. 3 Update 3; section history Ord. No. 2026-04, § 2, 4-14-2026; retrieved 2026-08-17) + regional screening defaults for rules not yet loaded City values shown are for the typical single-family district — per-parcel zoning is not ingested, so confirm your parcel’s specific zoning district with the city. Some rules shown use a regional screening default — the Rogers ordinance is not yet loaded for them; verify locally before relying on any number. Rogers assigns setbacks by residential district, and this product does not yet know which district each parcel is in. The figures shown are the most restrictive of the city's five residential districts, so the buildable area may be larger than shown; confirm your parcel's district with the City.
What we know, what we estimate, what you must verify
What we know
Recorded, authoritative facts.
Building rules (cited)3 rule sets cited to Rogers City Code §125-55 Tables 6–10 (most restrictive of the five residential districts)
Parcel boundaryRecorded county GIS parcel on file (not a survey)
Source: County GIS
JurisdictionRogers, Hennepin County
Source: County GIS
Market statusPotential build site — identified from county GIS
What we estimate
Modeled or preliminary — useful for screening, not decisions.
Preliminary setback envelope (per-edge range — front street unresolved between two plausible frontages)On a lot this size, zoning is not the practical limit on house size: the 75% total impervious surface cap (§125-55 Tables 6–10 a.2 Lot Coverage (75% in every residential district)) would allow a regulatory maximum of ≈ 492,337 sq ft — far more room than any house uses. Site conditions, access, utilities and budget govern what is practical here. Based on Rogers Residential Districts — Rogers City Code §125-55 Tables 6–10 (Municode/CivicPlus, api.municode.com client 15597 product 17241 job 499656; code currency Ord. No. 2026-13 enacted 2026-07-14, Supp. No. 3 Update 3; section history Ord. No. 2026-04, § 2, 4-14-2026; retrieved 2026-08-17); confirm your parcel's zoning.
Sewer proximity (estimated)Public utilities may be available nearby; connection location & fees require confirmation
55% confidence
What you must verify
Professional and municipal confirmations before you build.
Boundary survey (a recorded GIS boundary is not a survey)
Wetland delineation by a certified delineator
Soil borings & septic feasibility (if no municipal sewer)
Utility connection points, capacity and SAC/WAC fees with the city or utility
Permit eligibility and any overlay/PUD conditions with the jurisdiction
Easements, covenants and title work
Final setbacks and buildable area per the current local ordinance
Actual construction cost from builder quotes
What each signal means
Written for homeowners; open “the details” on any card for the builder view and the raw measurement behind it.
Slope & terrain
?Unknown
Slope & terrain: not yet evaluated — unknown is not the same as no concern. no slope statistics
The details
Builder view: Slope & terrain: no qualifying evidence in the current dataset (no slope statistics); treat as unresolved, not as clear.
No underlying measurement on file for this signal.
Unknown ≠ clear: absence of data is never treated as "no concern".
0% confidence
Flood mapping
!Concern
Part of this parcel is mapped in a FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area (zone AE); flood insurance and elevation requirements likely apply — confirm with the city and a surveyor.
The details
Builder view: FEMA zone AE (SFHA) per current NFHL data; floodplain ordinance and base flood elevation requirements apply — elevation certificate and local floodplain review required.
FEMA flood zone: Zone AE (FEMA special flood hazard area)
Source: FEMA NFHL flood hazard zones (MN DNR GDRS mirror) · as of 8/13/2026 · 90% confidence
Zone boundary is map-scale; a surveyed elevation governs.
90% confidence · source: FEMA NFHL flood hazard zones (MN DNR GDRS mirror) · as of 8/13/2026
Wetland indicators
!Concern
Mapped wetland/public-water indicators overlap this parcel. This is a screening result, not a confirmed legal boundary — a wetland delineation is recommended before design or purchase decisions.
Uses a regional screening default — the local ordinance is not yet loaded. Verify locally.
The details
Builder view: NWI/PWI overlap present — a SCREENING constraint, not a delineated boundary; a wetland delineation is recommended before design or purchase decisions. A 50 ft screening buffer applies (screening default). WCA/LGU review applies if impacts are proposed.
Wetland mapped (NWI): Yes
Source: Updated MN National Wetlands Inventory · as of 8/13/2026 · 90% confidence
DNR public waters: No
Source: DNR Public Waters Inventory basins · as of 8/13/2026 · 90% confidence
Screening-level mapping only; field conditions govern.
regional/state screening default (unverified) — not the local ordinance; verify with the jurisdiction
50% confidence · rule tier: regional screening default (unverified) · source: Updated MN National Wetlands Inventory; DNR Public Waters Inventory basins · as of 8/13/2026
Sanitary sewer
iInfoModeled
Public utilities may be available nearby; connection location & fees require confirmation
Uses a regional screening default — the local ordinance is not yet loaded. Verify locally.
The details
Builder view: sanitary sewer: inside the regional wastewater service area (MUSA) — membership is a planning designation, NOT a connection at the boundary; timing unknown, confirm staging with the city.
Sewer service state: Inside planned regional wastewater service area — not a sewer connection
Service-area membership is modeled from regional GIS, not utility records.
Without a municipal sewer connection, an on-site septic system (SSTS) is required, including a primary and alternate drainfield site (regional/state screening default (unverified) — not the local ordinance; verify with the jurisdiction).
Water service: not yet evaluated — unknown is not the same as no concern. water service not documented
The details
Builder view: Water service: no qualifying evidence in the current dataset (water service not documented); treat as unresolved, not as clear.
No underlying measurement on file for this signal.
Unknown ≠ clear: absence of data is never treated as "no concern".
0% confidence
School district
iInfo
This parcel is in the Elk River Public School District school district per current boundary data.
The details
Builder view: School district: Elk River Public School District (MDE boundary data; boundaries can change — verify for enrollment decisions).
School district: Elk River Public School District
Source: MDE school district boundaries · as of 8/13/2026 · 90% confidence
90% confidence · source: MDE school district boundaries · as of 8/13/2026
Setback & frontage envelope
iInfo
On a lot this size, zoning is not the practical limit on house size: the 75% total impervious surface cap (§125-55 Tables 6–10 a.2 Lot Coverage (75% in every residential district)) would allow a regulatory maximum of ≈ 492,337 sq ft — far more room than any house uses. Site conditions, access, utilities and budget govern what is practical here. Based on Rogers Residential Districts — Rogers City Code §125-55 Tables 6–10 (Municode/CivicPlus, api.municode.com client 15597 product 17241 job 499656; code currency Ord. No. 2026-13 enacted 2026-07-14, Supp. No. 3 Update 3; section history Ord. No. 2026-04, § 2, 4-14-2026; retrieved 2026-08-17); confirm your parcel's zoning.
The details
Builder view: Regulatory maximum footprint ≈ 492,337 sq ft (bound by the coverage/impervious cap, not by setbacks). Regulation is not the binding constraint at this parcel size. Based on Rogers Residential Districts — Rogers City Code §125-55 Tables 6–10 (Municode/CivicPlus, api.municode.com client 15597 product 17241 job 499656; code currency Ord. No. 2026-13 enacted 2026-07-14, Supp. No. 3 Update 3; section history Ord. No. 2026-04, § 2, 4-14-2026; retrieved 2026-08-17); confirm your parcel's zoning.
No underlying measurement on file for this signal.
Regulatory maximum — not a suggested or typical house size.
Confidence is limited by: the zoning district is assumed (the city’s typical single-family district), not verified for this parcel.
Preliminary — not an approval or survey.
Which street this lot fronts is not resolved, but both plausible frontage assignments were evaluated and every one gives the same buildable area — the unresolved front does not change this figure.
55% confidence · rule tier: local (city/township) ordinance data · source: Rogers Residential Districts — Rogers City Code §125-55 Tables 6–10 (Municode/CivicPlus, api.municode.com client 15597 product 17241 job 499656; code currency Ord. No. 2026-13 enacted 2026-07-14, Supp. No. 3 Update 3; section history Ord. No. 2026-04, § 2, 4-14-2026; retrieved 2026-08-17) · as of 8/17/2026
Shoreland status
–N/A
This lot is outside mapped shoreland zones — no public water within 1,000 ft (lake) or 300 ft (watercourse) in the current DNR screening.
The details
Builder view: Not in a DNR PWI shoreland zone per statutory-distance screening; shoreland overlay standards do not apply. Screening-level: the mapped OHWL is not a survey.
DNR shoreland classification: Not in a shoreland district
Source: DNR Public Waters Inventory basins · as of 8/13/2026 · 90% confidence
No mapped public water within 1000 ft (lake) / 300 ft (watercourse) of this parcel in the current DNR PWI screening.
90% confidence · source: DNR Public Waters Inventory basins · as of 8/13/2026
Trees & canopy
?Unknown
Trees & canopy: not yet evaluated — unknown is not the same as no concern. tree-canopy coverage not yet computed
The details
Builder view: Trees & canopy: no qualifying evidence in the current dataset (tree-canopy coverage not yet computed); treat as unresolved, not as clear.
No underlying measurement on file for this signal.
Unknown ≠ clear: absence of data is never treated as "no concern".
0% confidence
Build on this lot
A builder can turn the verify list above into answers — ask about this lot with no obligation.
Get a build evaluation from vetted Twin Cities builders. This is a request to find a builder — not a real-estate listing or offer of representation.
Build in Rogers
These builders list Rogers in their service area (HomeBuildersMN directory, as of 2026-07-25).